Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 评测：M4 Pro 和雾面显示屏的巨大升级Apple MacBook Pro 14 更新了，除了新的 M4 Pro SoC 现在速度更快之外，它还可以选择哑光显示屏。此外，它的网络摄像头也从 200 万像素提升到了 1200 万像素，并且首次加入了 Thunderbolt 5 端口。Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 11/09/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
🇫🇷 🇪🇸 🇵🇹 🇮🇹 🇳🇱 🇸🇪 🇹🇷 🇵🇱 🇭🇺 🇷🇺 Apple ARM Laptop / Notebook MacBook Thunderbolt Windows
评价：性能更强，终于有了雾面显示屏由于采用了全新的 M4 Pro SoC，2024 版 MacBook Pro 14 的性能得到了大幅提升，在很多情况下，其处理器性能都超过了旧款旗舰产品 M3 Max。同时，其功耗也有所下降。这是一项了不起的成就，Apple ，进一步扩大了其在多核和单核性能方面的领先优势。新 GPU 的速度也提高了约 30%。
当然，其他亮点还包括它的磨砂显示屏选项。如果你经常在明亮的环境或户外使用 MacBook，那么它的画质依然令人印象深刻，而屏幕的哑光表面则改变了游戏规则。此外，Apple ，在使用环境光传感器时，SDR 亮度提高到了 1000 尼特以上。除此以外，迷你 LED 面板在许多方面--从高亮度到处理 HDR 内容的出色程度--仍然是值得借鉴的。
在日常使用中，MacBook Pro 14 可以长时间保持静音或至少是非常安静，电池续航时间依然很短。不过，与 M3 代相比，我们还找不到任何真正的改进。
Test device courtesy of Apple Deutschland
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
总的来说，M4 Pro 比上一代产品需要更多的电能，这就是为什么笔记本电脑在负载情况下表面温度会很高，尤其是在键盘区域。此外，M4 Pro 缺乏维护选项，再加上Apple 在内存/存储升级方面的巨额附加费用，这些都是它的缺点。它的键盘也仍有改进的余地。
Pros+ 优质稳定的外壳色彩准确的出色显示屏/可选哑光显示屏
+ 色彩准确的出色显示屏/可选哑光显示屏
+ 极高的 hdr 亮度/改进的 sdr 亮度
+ 日常使用时始终超级安静极高的
+ 极高的系统性能
+ 性能大幅提升的 M4 Pro
+ 运行时间长出色
+ 出色的扬声器
+ 最高 128 GB 内存（M4 Max）和 8 TB SSD 存储空间
+ 具有高级功能的 12 百万像素网络摄像头Cons- cpu 和 gpu 同时负载时性能受限
- 持续的 pwm 闪烁和缓慢的响应时间
- 保修期仅为 12 个月
- 几乎没有维护选项
- 内存和固态硬盘附加费极高
- 网络摄像头没有 FaceID，照片/视频分辨率仍然很低
价格和供应情况新款 MacBook Pro 14 从 2024 年 11 月 8 日开始接受预订。你可以直接通过Apple 网站购买，配备 24GB 内存和 512GB 固态硬盘的小型 M4 Pro 机型售价为 1999 美元。
亚马逊（Amazon）等在线零售商也有售，目前相同型号的售价为 1,949 美元。
可能的替代品比较
ImageModel / ReviewGeizhalsWeightHeightDisplay
1.91.8%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro (14 cores) ⎘ Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU ⎘48 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSDBestpreis 2454.1603816505€ LaptopsDirect2. 2469€ galaxus3. 2469€ Cyberport Stores Deutschland1.6 kg15.5 mm14.20"3024x1964254 PPIMiniLED
2.92.8% v7 (old)Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 MaxApple M3 Max 16-Core ⎘ Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU ⎘64 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSDListenpreis 5264€Geizhals Suche1.6 kg15.5 mm14.20"3024x1964254 PPIMini-LED
3.89.8% v7 (old)Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8Intel Core i7-13705H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ⎘32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSDListenpreis 2300€Geizhals Suche1.7 kg17.6 mm14.50"3072x1920250 PPIMini-LED
4.86.3% v7 (old)Dell XPS 14 2024 OLEDIntel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ⎘32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSDListenpreis 2949€Geizhals Suche1.8 kg19 mm14.50"3200x2000260 PPIOLED
5.89.7% v7 (old)Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSDListenpreis 2700 USDGeizhals Suche1.9 kg17.99 mm14.00"2560x1600216 PPIIPS
6.93% v7 (old)Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403UAMD Ryzen 9 8945HS ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSDBestpreis 1999€ nullprozentshop.de2. 1999€ notebooksbilliger.de3. 2015.8€ notebooksbilliger.at1.5 kg16.3 mm14.00"2880x1800243 PPIOLED
7.85.5% v7 (old)Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060Intel Core i7-13700H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU ⎘64 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSDBestpreis 4359.42€ NRE - Computer & Service2 kg22 mm14.40"2400x1600200 PPIIPS
4 Reviews ← exclude selected types
Table of Contents评价：性能更强，终于有了雾面显示屏规格外壳 - MacBook Pro 现在只有黑色和银色两种颜色连接性 - Thunderbolt 5 和 1200 万像素摄像头输入设备 - 舒适的键盘，出色的触觉触控板显示屏 - 小型 LED 显示屏，现在可选择哑光表面性能 - M4 Pro 最高配备 48GB 内存排放量电源管理 - 电池寿命不变Notebookcheck 总评分
Apple MacBook Pro 推出了 2024 机型，不出所料，该机型采用了新一代 M4 处理器。继普通 M4 SoC 在 iPad Pro 上首次亮相后，M4 Pro/Max 版本也已上市。除了性能更强之外，这也是你第一次可以使用 Thunderbolt 5。配备 M4 Pro 的全新 MacBook Pro 14 的起售价为 1,999 美元。我们测试样品的价格约为 3,350 美元。它配备了速度更快的 M4 Pro 变体、48 GB 内存、2 TB 固态硬盘以及我们从 iMac 上已经了解到的全新纳米纹理玻璃。
规格
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro (MacBook Pro 14 2024 Series)ProcessorApple M4 Pro (14 cores) 14 x 2.6 - 4.5 GHz, 46 W PL2 / Short Burst, 40 W PL1 / SustainedGraphics adapterApple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, 32 W TDPMemory48 GB , LPDDR5x-8533, onboard, max. 48 GBDisplay14.20 inch 16:10, 3024 x 1964 pixel 254 PPI, MiniLED, glossy: no, HDR, 120 HzStorageApple SSD AP2048Z, 2048 GB , 2007 GB freeConnections3 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 3 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 3 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm stereo, Card Reader: SDXC, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness SensorNetworkingBroadcom 0x14E4, 0x4388 WiFi 6E AirPort (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3Sizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 15.5 x 312.6 x 221.2Battery72.6 Wh, 6269 mAh Lithium-IonOperating SystemApple macOS 15 SequoiaCameraWebcam: 12 MP Center StagePrimary Camera: 12 MPixAdditional featuresSpeakers: 6-speaker system, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 96W PSU, 12 Months WarrantyWeight1.591 kg, Power Supply: 365 g
Price3989 EuroAmazon$2,348.00LinksApple homepageNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - MacBook Pro 现在只有黑色和银色两种颜色2024 版 MacBook Pro 14 现在只有银色或黑色，无论你选择哪种处理器。太空灰不再是可选颜色。除此之外，我们注意到其外壳设计没有任何变化。特别是 14 英寸版 MacBook Pro，由于其底座高度不变的形状，看起来相对笨重，但厚度并不过分，仅为 15.5 毫米。采用一体式机身结构的 MacBook 仍然拥有出色的制造质量。不过，与银色机型相比，黑色机型更容易藏污纳垢。
铰链将屏幕盖固定得非常牢固，调整角度时几乎不会晃动，但显示屏的最大开启角度仍然只有 135 度。显示屏顶部边框的凹槽看起来还是不太美观，但即便如此，与竞争对手产品上的许多摄像头凸起相比，我们还是更喜欢这种解决方案。我们也注意到在这方面没有任何功能限制。
尺寸比较
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U DIN A4 ❌
连接性 - Thunderbolt 5 和 1200 万像素摄像头配备 M4 Pro/M4 Max 的 MacBook Pro 14 的基本连接性没有太大变化，因为除了三个 USB-C 端口外，它还有一个完整的 HDMI 输出、用于充电的 MagSafe 和一个全尺寸 SD 读卡器。不过，M4 Pro/M4 Max 的配置现在已经支持最大传输速率为 120 GB/s 的 Thunderbolt 5。M4 Pro 支持向两个外部显示器（除内置屏幕外）输出图像，而 M4 Max 最多支持四个外部显示器。
左：MagSafe、2 个 USB-C 4.0 和 Thunderbolt 5（120 Gbit/s、DisplayPort ALT 模式、Power Delivery）、3.5 毫米音频
右侧SD 读卡器、带 Thunderbolt 5（120 Gbit/s、DisplayPort ALT 模式、Power Delivery）的 USB-C 4.0、HDMI 输出SD 读卡器非晶磁盘标记 - SD 卡右侧的读卡器不能完全接收 SD 卡，因此不适合用于永久存储扩展。它与我们的参考卡（Angelbird AV Pro V60）配合使用的速度非常快，我们测得的最高速度为 231 MB/s，复制图像文件时的速度为 161 MB/s。
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060Intel Core i7-13700H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
164 MB/s +1%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro (14 cores) (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
161.7 MB/s Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 MaxApple M3 Max 16-Core (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
156 MB/s -4%Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403UAMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
154 MB/s -5%Dell XPS 14 2024 OLEDIntel Core Ultra 7 155H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
144 MB/s -11%Average of class Multimedia (19.3 - 198, n=43, last 2 years)
102.3 MB/s -37%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8Intel Core i7-13705H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
75.2 MB/s -53%maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro (14 cores) (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
231.3 MB/s Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 MaxApple M3 Max 16-Core (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
221.3 MB/s -4%Dell XPS 14 2024 OLEDIntel Core Ultra 7 155H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
202.5 MB/s -12%Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403UAMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
193.6 MB/s -16%Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060Intel Core i7-13700H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
191.6 MB/s -17%Average of class Multimedia (27.4 - 262, n=43, last 2 years)
144.8 MB/s -37%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8Intel Core i7-13705H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
83.4 MB/s -64%
交流它的 Wi-Fi 模块没有任何变化，仍然支持 Wi-Fi 6E 标准和蓝牙 5.3。与华硕的参考路由器配合使用时，它的传输速率非常好且稳定，但它还不支持更新的 Wi-Fi 7 标准。Apple ，它仍然没有为 MacBook Pro 提供任何蜂窝网络选项（LTE/5G）。
NetworkingApple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 ProBroadcom 0x14E4, 0x4388 WiFi 6E AirPort iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1624 (min: 1567) MBit/s ∼92%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1679 (min: 1603) MBit/s ∼94%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 MaxBroadcom 0x14E4, 0x4388 WiFi 6E AirPort iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1735 (min: 1700) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1789 (min: 1707) MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1479 (min: 744) MBit/s ∼84%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1449 (min: 1255) MBit/s ∼81%
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLEDIntel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1661 (min: 1545) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1683 (min: 1617) MBit/s ∼94%
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508Qualcomm FastConnect 7800 iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1499 (min: 1396) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1612 (min: 1575) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1428 (min: 709) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1521 (min: 1486) MBit/s ∼100%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403UMediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1756 (min: 1671) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1710 (min: 1683) MBit/s ∼96%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210 iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1347 (min: 1261) MBit/s ∼77%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1669 (min: 1648) MBit/s ∼93%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1624 (1567-1680) Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1679 (1603-1714)
网络摄像头网络摄像头现在配备了 1200 万像素传感器，因此分辨率比以前（200 万像素）高出很多。此外，网络摄像头现在还支持跟随模式（图像随着人的移动而移动）和桌面视图，在桌面视图中，除了常规显示屏外，笔记本电脑前面的区域也会被记录下来，例如用于显示产品。不过，使用 PhotoBooth 应用程序截图的分辨率仍然很低（1,440 x 960 像素），而且录制的质量也没有比以前好多少，这同样适用于视频（最大 1080p）。仍然不支持 Face ID。
19.8 ∆E11.2 ∆E16.2 ∆E17.9 ∆E14.2 ∆E10.3 ∆E9.4 ∆E13.5 ∆E12.8 ∆E11.2 ∆E8.9 ∆E7.1 ∆E9.3 ∆E12.1 ∆E18.3 ∆E5.8 ∆E15.2 ∆E15.1 ∆E3.4 ∆E7.7 ∆E15.1 ∆E16.6 ∆E16.1 ∆E2.6 ∆EColorChecker Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro: 12.08 ∆E min: 2.6 - max: 19.77 ∆E
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro
维护机箱底盖可以拆卸，但除了清洁风扇外，你什么也做不了，因为所有部件都是焊接上去的。
内部建设可持续性Apple 提供了大量有关其环保工作的信息，并在其 网站上为 MacBook Pro 14 提供了一份单独的报告。https://www.apple.com/environment/pdf/products/notebooks/MacBook_Pro_14-inch_PER_Oct2024.pdf.例如，其包装完全采用无塑料包装，MacBook 本身也主要由可回收材料制成。不过，用户没有维护或升级选项。
输入设备 - 舒适的键盘，出色的触觉触控板与外壳一样，今年的机型在输入设备方面也没有做任何改动，因此我们可以长话短说。尽管黑色键盘的键程相对较低，但打字时感觉非常舒适。即便如此，市场上还是有更好的键盘，例如优秀的商务笔记本电脑或竞争对手的设备，如 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G14.另一方面，MacBook 的键盘背光可调节程度之高，Windows 系统的竞争对手都望尘莫及。
输入设备
键盘背光得益于出色的软件集成，触觉触控板堪称笔记本电脑领域的最佳解决方案之一。虽然这一点没有改变，但竞争对手已经迎头赶上，推出了边缘手势（例如：华为 Matebook X Pro）。 华为 Matebook X ProApple 至今仍未在 MacBook 上安装触摸屏。
显示屏 - 小型 LED 显示屏，现在可选择哑光表面子像素阵列总体而言，Apple ，新款 2024 MacBook Pro 14 选择了与之前相同的迷你 LED 显示屏。屏幕对角线为 14.2 英寸，像素为 3,072 x 1,964。其基本长宽比为 16:10，额外的 44 个垂直像素用于摄像头凹槽旁边的区域。在功能上，凹槽不会妨碍显示效果，在全面屏模式下，凹槽旁边的区域会被简单隐藏，从而显示标准的 16:10 图像。必要时，屏幕会将频率提高到最高 120 Hz。
不过，与前代产品相比，该机型有两项新功能具有明显优势。首先，现在的显示屏还采用了纳米纹理玻璃，即磨砂表面。我们已经从 iMac 及其 Studio 显示屏上熟悉了这一点，但在 MacBook Pro 上，纳米纹理滤镜直接集成到偏振滤镜中。我们的测试设备采用了哑光面板（附加费为 150 美元），恼人的反光现在已成为过去。从主观上看，与普通面板直接比较，画质只受到很小的影响，因为色彩不再那么鲜艳。不过，即使在显示明亮的内容时，我们也注意到画面没有颗粒感。
第二个变化涉及显示屏的亮度。原则上，其最大 SDR 亮度仍略高于 600 cd/m²。但是，当亮度传感器启动时，其 SDR 亮度在明亮环境下可达到 1,000 cd/m² 以上（我们测量到的最高亮度为 1,070 cd/m²）。这意味着你不再需要使用额外的应用程序。它的黑阶为 0，因此对比度极高，而且没有光晕。不过，也会出现一些明显的重影，例如，当浅色鼠标指针在深色背景上移动时。亮度和色温都可以根据环境光线自动调节。
最大 HDR 亮度在 HDR 模式下，该面板的最高亮度可达 1,706 cd/m²，而在显示几乎全白的画面时，亮度仍高达 1,236 cd/m²。说到这里，我们必须再次称赞Apple 的 HDR 实现。只要应用程序提供 HDR 信号，macOS 就会识别，然后在该区域提供更高的亮度--无论是全屏还是图像部分。色彩管理也会保持激活状态。在这方面，Windows 现在确实应该效仿。
605cd/m²624cd/m²621cd/m²620cd/m²638cd/m²625cd/m²614cd/m²625cd/m²615cd/m²
Distribution of brightnesstested with X-Rite i1Pro 2Maximum: 638 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 620.8 cd/m² Minimum: 1.04 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 95 %Center on Battery: 638 cd/m²Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 0.6 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.82}ΔE Greyscale Calman: 0.8 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}89% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)100% sRGB (Argyll 3D)99.6% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)Gamma: 2.22CCT: 6430 K
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 ProMiniLED, 3024x1964, 14.2", 120 HzApple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 MaxMini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.2", 120 HzLenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8CSOT T3 MNE507HZ2-1, Mini-LED, 3072x1920, 14.5", 165 HzDell XPS 14 2024 OLEDSDC41A2, OLED, 3200x2000, 14.5", 120 HzRazer Blade 14 RZ09-0508TL140ADXP04-0, IPS, 2560x1600, 14", 240 HzAsus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403UATNA40CU05-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 HzMicrosoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060LQ144P1JX01, IPS, 2400x1600, 14.4", 120 HzDisplay0%0%-1%-2%0%-19% Display P3 Coverage99.699.2 0%92 -8%98.5 -1%96.9 -3%99.6 0%66.7 -33% sRGB Coverage10099.7 0%100 0%99.8 0%100 0%99 -1% AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage8996.9 9%87.2 -2%85 -4%89.9 1%68.9 -23%Response Times-8%84%99%90%99%26% Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *77.2 ?(36.8, 40.4)80.8 ?(36.2, 44.6) -5%12.7 ?(4.6, 8.1) 84%0.7 ?(0.39, 0.31) 99%6 ?(2.8, 3.2) 92%0.62 ?(0.33, 0.29) 99%77.6 ?(35.4, 42.2) -1% Response Time Black / White *71.6 ?(44.2, 27.4)78.8 ?(49.6, 29.2) -10%11.4 ?(3.7, 7.7) 84%0.77 ?(0.42, 0.35) 99%8.3 ?(5, 4.3) 88%0.68 ?(0.36, 0.32) 99%34.3 ?(7.7, 26.6) 52% PWM Frequency14880 ?(100)14878 ?(100)6000 ?(70, 330)480960 ?(60)17600 ?(100) PWM Amplitude *90Screen-69%-215%-102%-109%-18%-1%Brightness middle638610 -4%670 5%351 -45%484.1 -24%423 -34%511 -20%Brightness621600 -3%680 10%353 -43%466 -25%424 -32%503 -19%Brightness Distribution9596 1%89 -6%97 2%89 -6%98 3%89 -6%Black Level *0.190.380.010.26Colorchecker dE 2000 *0.61.7 -183%4 -567%1.7 -183%2.23 -272%0.7 -17%0.5 17%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *1.42.3 -64%4.5 -221%2.2 -57%4.57 -226%1.8 -29%1.1 21%Greyscale dE 2000 *0.82.1 -163%4.9 -513%3.1 -288%1.6 -100%0.8 -0%0.8 -0%Gamma2.22 99%2.22 99%2.22 99%2.12 104%2.24 98%2.18 101%2.19 100%CCT6430 101%6874 95%5735 113%6616 98%6816 95%6505 100%6650 98%Contrast35261274423001965Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *1.30.80.74Total Average (Program / Settings)-26% /
-48%-44% /
-102%-1% /
-38%-7% /
-44%27% /
8%2% /
-1%* ... smaller is better
卡尔曼灰度
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN 色彩检查器P3 覆盖率： 99.6 %MacBook Pro 14 开箱即进行了出色的校准。我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件（X-Rite i1 Pro 2）对其进行了分析，其灰度和色彩结果令人惊叹。面板完全覆盖了 sRGB 色彩空间和 P3 空间。
Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White71.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 44.2 ms rise↘ 27.4 ms fallThe screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 100 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.4 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey77.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 36.8 ms rise↘ 40.4 ms fallThe screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 99 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32 ms).
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM detected 14880 HzAmplitude: 90 % ≤ 100 % brightness settingThe display backlight flickers at 14880 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.
The frequency of 14880 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8291 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.
我们注意到 MacBook Pro 的迷你 LED 面板上有 14.88 kHz 的持续闪烁。对于绝大多数用户来说，这种高频率应该不是问题，但它确实使我们难以确定屏幕的响应时间。
PWM 闪烁 0 % 亮度
PWM 闪烁 25 % 亮度
PWM 闪烁 50 % 亮度
PWM 闪烁 75 % 亮度
PWM 闪烁 100 % 亮度
在阳光下
室外（阴天）
全新 MacBook Pro 14 采用磨砂显示屏表面和改进的 SDR 亮度，非常适合户外使用。即使在明亮的阳光下，只要避免阳光的直接反射，所有内容依然清晰可辨。与旧款相比，这是一个巨大的优势，可能会成为一些用户换机的理由。此外，其视角稳定性也没有任何问题。
视角稳定性性能 - M4 Pro 最高配备 48GB 内存2024 MacBook Pro 14 共有五种不同的处理器可供选择：每种处理器都会影响内存容量。搭载 M4 Pro 的机型可配备 24 或 48 GB 内存；如果要配备 36、64 或 128 GB 内存，则必须使用 M4 Max SoC。在这方面，MacBook Pro 也有别于新款 Mac Mini，后者的 M4 Pro 最多可配备 64 GB 内存。
测试条件Apple 提供三种不同的能量曲线：我们无法检测到后两者之间的性能差异。只有风扇在负载情况下声音明显变大（最大 44.5 分贝对 56 分贝）。因此，我们使用预设的自动模式进行了以下基准测试和测量。低充电模式明显限制了 SoC 的性能（最大约 9.5 瓦），但风扇在任何时候都非常安静，甚至听不到声音（约 2,400 rpm 时最大 25.1 dB(A)）。
处理器 - M4 Pro，16 个 CPU 内核M4 Pro SoC（图片：Apple)新的Apple M4 Pro 有两种配置级别，即 12 或 14 个 CPU 内核。每种情况下，都有 4 个效率核心和 8 或 10 个性能核心。因此，安装在我们测试设备上的更强大的 M4 Pro 与更小的 M4 Max 不相上下。总体而言，与老一代 M3 相比，核心配置发生了很大变化。这同样适用于功耗，因为 M3 Pro 的最大功耗为 28 瓦，非常节俭，而 M4 Pro 的完整配置现在达到了 46 瓦，更接近老款 M3 Max（最大功耗 56 瓦）。虽然 46 瓦的功耗无法长期保持，但其约 40 瓦的永久功耗仍明显高于以前。
反过来，新处理器的性能也令人印象深刻。在单核测试中（功耗约为 6-6.5 瓦），它比老一代 M3 性能高出 20% 以上。它比最快的 Snapdragon X Elite（X1E-81-100）高出 39%。英特尔和 AMD 则落后更多，只有各自的 HX 处理器速度更快（但也需要更多电力）。
然而，M4 Pro 的多核性能却令人惊叹，因为它在 Cinebench 2024 和 Geekbench 中的表现都超过了老款 M3 Max（6-8%）。在电池模式下，其性能也保持不变。我们将在Apple M4 Pro 的分析文章中详细介绍它的效率。 分析文章中详细介绍新款 M4 Pro 的效率。
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core | Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core
Average Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) (1662 - 1729, n=2)
1696 Points +2%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro (14 cores)
1662 Points Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 MaxApple M3 Max 16-Core
1532 Points -8%Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED SnapdragonQualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100
1132 Points -32%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 12-Core
1059 Points -36%Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
988 Points -41%Average of class Multimedia (327 - 2069, n=61, last 2 years)
987 Points -41%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 11-Core
908 Points -45%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100
866 Points -48%Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403UAMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
861 Points -48%Dell XPS 14 2024 OLEDIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
667 Points -60%Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core
Average Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) (177 - 178, n=2)
177.5 Points 0%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro (14 cores)
177 Points Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 11-Core
144 Points -19%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 12-Core
143 Points -19%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 MaxApple M3 Max 16-Core
140 Points -21%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100
127 Points -28%Average of class Multimedia (72.5 - 178, n=42, last 2 years)
122.4 Points -31%Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
106.1 Points -40%Dell XPS 14 2024 OLEDIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
101.8 Points -42%Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403UAMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
98 Points -45%Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro (14 cores)
22544 Points Average Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) (22509 - 22544, n=2)
22527 Points 0%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 MaxApple M3 Max 16-Core
21264 Points -6%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100
15665 Points -31%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 12-Core
15480 Points -31%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8Intel Core i7-13705H
14547 Points -35%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8Intel Core i7-13705H
14067 Points -38%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 11-Core
14412 Points -36%Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED SnapdragonQualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100
14391 Points -36%Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
13715 Points -39%Average of class Multimedia (4983 - 25760, n=77, last 2 years)
13511 Points -40%Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060Intel Core i7-13700H
13504 Points -40%Dell XPS 14 2024 OLEDIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
13301 Points -41%Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403UAMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
13155 Points -42%Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro (14 cores)
3927 Points Average Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) (3836 - 3927, n=2)
3882 Points -1%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 MaxApple M3 Max 16-Core
3157 Points -20%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 12-Core
3138 Points -20%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 11-Core
3113 Points -21%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100
2834 Points -28%Average of class Multimedia (1534 - 3927, n=73, last 2 years)
2702 Points -31%Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
2684 Points -32%Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060Intel Core i7-13700H
2632 Points -33%Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403UAMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
2632 Points -33%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8Intel Core i7-13705H
2613 Points -33%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8Intel Core i7-13705H
2566 Points -35%Dell XPS 14 2024 OLEDIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
2440 Points -38%
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit3031 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core23433 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core2249 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core177 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core1662 Points
Help... in comparison
系统性能非晶记忆标记搭载 M4 Pro SoC 的新款 MacBook Pro 14 再次成为一款响应速度极快的笔记本电脑，能对所有输入做出即时响应。在测试过程中，我们没有发现任何稳定性问题，在基准测试中，新款 MBP 明显处于比较领域的前列。Apple ，与旧款 M3 Pro 相比，内存带宽增加了近 2 倍。
我们将在短期内添加针对 Adobe Photoshop 和 Premiere Pro 的 Puget Bench 测试。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness WebXPRT 3: Overall WebXPRT 4: Overall Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total CrossMark / Overall
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 ProM4 Pro 20-Core GPU, M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z
2162 Points Average Apple M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU (2148 - 2162, n=2)
2155 Points 0%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 MaxM3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple SSD AP2048Z
2032 Points -6%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13705H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1867 Points -14%Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 8945HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1830 Points -15%Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403UNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 8945HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1767 Points -18%Average of class Multimedia (866 - 2255, n=65, last 2 years)
1746 Points -19%Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
1733 Points -20%Dell XPS 14 2024 OLEDNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1690 Points -22%CrossMark / Productivity
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 ProM4 Pro 20-Core GPU, M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z
2010 Points Average Apple M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU (1980 - 2010, n=2)
1995 Points -1%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 MaxM3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple SSD AP2048Z
1832 Points -9%Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 8945HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1783 Points -11%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13705H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1739 Points -13%Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403UNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 8945HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1686 Points -16%Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2050, n=65, last 2 years)
1651 Points -18%Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
1618 Points -20%Dell XPS 14 2024 OLEDNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1603 Points -20%CrossMark / Creativity
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 ProM4 Pro 20-Core GPU, M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z
2594 Points Average Apple M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU (2590 - 2594, n=2)
2592 Points 0%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 MaxM3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple SSD AP2048Z
2509 Points -3%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13705H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2143 Points -17%Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
2001 Points -23%Average of class Multimedia (907 - 2795, n=65, last 2 years)
1975 Points -24%Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403UNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 8945HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1960 Points -24%Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 8945HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1935 Points -25%Dell XPS 14 2024 OLEDNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1909 Points -26%CrossMark / Responsiveness
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 8945HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1672 Points +7%Average Apple M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU (1556 - 1566, n=2)
1561 Points 0%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 ProM4 Pro 20-Core GPU, M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z
1556 Points Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13705H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1529 Points -2%Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403UNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 8945HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1489 Points -4%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 MaxM3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple SSD AP2048Z
1474 Points -5%Average of class Multimedia (605 - 2094, n=65, last 2 years)
1439 Points -8%Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
1381 Points -11%Dell XPS 14 2024 OLEDNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1373 Points -12%WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 ProM4 Pro 20-Core GPU, M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z
545 Points Average Apple M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU (525 - 545, n=2)
535 Points -2%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 MaxM3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple SSD AP2048Z
416 Points -24%Average of class Multimedia (136.4 - 545, n=67, last 2 years)
326 Points -40%Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 8945HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
324 Points -41%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13705H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
308 Points -43%Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
303 Points -44%Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403UNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 8945HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
303 Points -44%Dell XPS 14 2024 OLEDNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
281 Points -48%WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 ProM4 Pro 20-Core GPU, M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z
353 Points Average Apple M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU (337 - 353, n=2)
345 Points -2%Average of class Multimedia (167.3 - 353, n=60, last 2 years)
274 Points -22%Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
272 Points -23%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13705H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
271 Points -23%Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 8945HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
269 Points -24%Dell XPS 14 2024 OLEDNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
256 Points -27%Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403UNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 8945HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
250 Points -29%Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLEDNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
522 ms * -105%Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403UNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 8945HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
509 ms * -100%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13705H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
497 ms * -95%Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
495 ms * -94%Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 8945HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
488 ms * -92%Average of class Multimedia (254 - 835, n=72, last 2 years)
482 ms * -89%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 MaxM3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple SSD AP2048Z
379.2 ms * -49%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 ProM4 Pro 20-Core GPU, M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z
254.5 ms * Average Apple M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU (254 - 255, n=2)
254 ms * -0%* ... smaller is better
存储设备非晶盘标记我们的测试设备配备了著名的 2 TB AP2048Z 固态硬盘，用户首次启动设备后仍可使用 1.96 TB。PCIe 4.0 硬盘的性能非常出色。此外，MacBook Pro 仍然是少数几个可提供高达 8 TB SSD 存储空间的设备之一。不过，缺乏升级选项和高昂的附加费用显然是它的缺点。更多固态硬盘基准测试 这里.
Drive Performance Rating | Blackmagic Disk Speed Test Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 MaxApple SSD AP8192Z
100 pt Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 MaxApple SSD AP2048Z
87.4 pt Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 MaxApple SSD AP2048Z
87.2 pt Average Apple SSD AP2048Z
87.1 pt Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 ProApple SSD AP2048Z
85.9 pt Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 ProApple SSD AP2048Z
85.6 pt Average of class Multimedia
75.3 pt Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple SSD AP0512Z
67.4 pt Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 ProApple SSD AP0512Z
66.3 pt Apple MacBook Air 15 M3Apple SSD AP0512Z
45.5 pt Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3Apple SSD AP1024Z
43.5 pt Blackmagic Disk Speed Test
5GB ReadApple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 MaxApple SSD AP8192Z
5665.9 MB/s +5%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 MaxApple SSD AP2048Z
5379 MB/s 0%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 ProApple SSD AP2048Z
5378.2 MB/s Average Apple SSD AP2048Z (5294 - 5401, n=6)
5366 MB/s 0%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 ProApple SSD AP2048Z
5359.8 MB/s 0%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 MaxApple SSD AP2048Z
5294.2 MB/s -2%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple SSD AP0512Z
4756.4 MB/s -12%Average of class Multimedia (2877 - 5666, n=10, last 2 years)
4728 MB/s -12%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 ProApple SSD AP0512Z
4645.3 MB/s -14%Apple MacBook Air 15 M3Apple SSD AP0512Z
2947.8 MB/s -45%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3Apple SSD AP1024Z
2876.6 MB/s -47% 5GB WriteApple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 MaxApple SSD AP8192Z
8271 MB/s +31%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 MaxApple SSD AP2048Z
6699 MB/s +6%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 MaxApple SSD AP2048Z
6602 MB/s +5%Average Apple SSD AP2048Z (6314 - 6713, n=6)
6572 MB/s +4%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 ProApple SSD AP2048Z
6388.9 MB/s +1%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 ProApple SSD AP2048Z
6313.9 MB/s Average of class Multimedia (2993 - 8271, n=10, last 2 years)
5548 MB/s -12%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple SSD AP0512Z
4198.7 MB/s -34%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 ProApple SSD AP0512Z
4192.9 MB/s -34%Apple MacBook Air 15 M3Apple SSD AP0512Z
3217.8 MB/s -49%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3Apple SSD AP1024Z
2992.9 MB/s -53%
图形卡新款 M4 Pro 的两个型号配备了不同的图形卡。性能较弱的型号配备了 16 个 GPU 核心，而我们测试设备中速度较快的型号则配备了 20 个 GPU 核心。与旧款 M3 Pro（分别为 14 和 18 个 GPU 核心）相比，每个核心增加了 2 个。M3 Pro 的 18 核 GPU 最大功耗为 28 瓦，而 M4 Pro 则高达 32 瓦。我们无法读出其 GPU 时钟。
它的性能再次表现出色，因为我们注意到，与配备更快 18 核 GPU 的旧款 M3 Pro 相比，它的性能提高了 30% 以上。在 WildLife Extreme Unlimited 测试中，新款 M4 Pro GPU 甚至与华硕 ROG Zephyrus G14 中的GeForce RTX 4070 笔记本电脑不相上下。
在进行图像/视频编辑或大型渲染时，大容量共享内存也是 M4 GPU 的一大优势。无论是在电池模式下还是在持续负载情况下，其 GPU 性能都能保持稳定。更多基准测试和效率比较，请参阅我们即将发布的分析文章。
3DMark | GFXBench | Geekbench 6.4 | Cinebench 2024 3DMark
Wild Life Extreme UnlimitedApple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 MaxApple M3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core
31403 Points +63%Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403UNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
19452 Points +1%Average Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU (19284 - 19345, n=2)
19315 Points 0%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
19284 Points Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
15268 Points -21%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13705H
15208 Points -21%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
14545 Points -25%Average of class Multimedia (3164 - 37434, n=28, last 2 years)
14210 Points -26%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 11-Core
12094 Points -37%Dell XPS 14 2024 OLEDNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
9394 Points -51%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100
6978 Points -64% Steel Nomad Light ScoreApple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
7809 Points Average Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU (7781 - 7809, n=2)
7795 Points 0%Average of class Multimedia (1147 - 13989, n=32, last 2 years)
5604 Points -28%Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 9Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
3406 Points -56%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100
2467 Points -68%GFXBench
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier OffscreenApple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 MaxApple M3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core
188.2 fps +50%Average Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU (125.7 - 125.8, n=2)
125.8 fps 0%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
125.7 fps Average of class Multimedia (36.4 - 232, n=17, last 2 years)
105.9 fps -16%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
97.8 fps -22%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 11-Core
79 fps -37%Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 9Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
28.5 fps -77%2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier OffscreenApple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 MaxApple M3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core
416 fps +47%Average Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU (284 - 284, n=2)
284 fps 0%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
283.5 fps Average of class Multimedia (73.3 - 516, n=17, last 2 years)
230 fps -19%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
219.7 fps -23%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 11-Core
178.7 fps -37%Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 9Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
66.1 fps -77%1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier OffscreenApple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 MaxApple M3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core
858 fps +14%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
751 fps Average Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU (746 - 751, n=2)
748 fps 0%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
580 fps -23%Average of class Multimedia (178.3 - 1302, n=16, last 2 years)
578 fps -23%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 11-Core
481.9 fps -36%Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 9Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
161.9 fps -78%Geekbench 6.4
GPU MetalApple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 MaxApple M3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core
154675 Points +37%Average Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU (113258 - 114278, n=2)
113768 Points 0%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
113258 Points Average of class Multimedia (47494 - 179746, n=10, last 2 years)
106862 Points -6%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
78324 Points -31%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 11-Core
68043 Points -40% GPU VulkanAsus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 9Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
36196 Points Dell XPS 14 2024 OLEDNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
35419 Points Average of class Multimedia (7760 - 118336, n=58, last 2 years)
35016 Points Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403UNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
30419 Points Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100
27014 Points Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13705H
23395 Points Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13705H
21532 Points Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
21215 Points Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
19700 Points Cinebench 2024 - GPU
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 MaxApple M3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core
13073 Points +44%Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
11518 Points +27%Average of class Multimedia (3289 - 16546, n=18, last 2 years)
9170 Points +1%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
9085 Points Average Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU (8851 - 9085, n=2)
8968 Points -1%Dell XPS 14 2024 OLEDNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5981 Points -34%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
5980 Points -34%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 11-Core
5459 Points -40%
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score
7809 points3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
7818 pointsHelp
游戏性能除了模拟游戏外，越来越多适用于Apple M 处理器的原生游戏也开始上市。其中包括《博德之门 3》、《生化危机村》和《无人天空》。所有这些游戏都能顺利运行，《博德之门 3》即使在 1080p 的最大细节下也能以约 60fps 的速度流畅运行，这使得 MacBook 可以与 RTX 4050 笔记本电脑等专用 GPU 相媲美。虽然原生版本将于明年推出，但它在玩《赛博朋克》等模拟游戏时的表现也不差。即使在长时间的游戏过程中，该设备的游戏性能也能保持完全稳定。
Baldur's Gate 3 | Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty | Total War Pharaoh | Total War: Three Kingdoms | The Witcher 3 | Shadow of the Tomb Raider Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
90.1 fps +48%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 MaxApple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU
90 fps +48%HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
73.2 fps +20%Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
71.3 fps +17%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU
61 fps Dell XPS 14 2024 OLEDIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
48.3 fps -21%Average of class Multimedia (7.8 - 127.3, n=53, last 2 years)
46.6 fps -24%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU
43 fps -30%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 11-Core, Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU
39 fps -36%Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 9Intel Core Ultra 9 288V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
27.8 fps -54%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
19 fps -69%Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
88.6 (53.5min - 121.7max) fps +124%Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403UAMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
73.9 (15.6min - 111.2max) fps +87%Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV-WB94AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
73.3 (60min - 93.3max) fps +85%Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
60.59 (14.86min - 90.37max) fps +53%HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
56.7 (31.1min - 85.6max) fps +43%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 MaxApple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU
40.8 fps +3%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU
39.6 fps Dell XPS 14 2024 OLEDIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
35.8 (30min - 46.3max) fps -10%Average of class Multimedia (6.41 - 97.8, n=65, last 2 years)
35.8 fps -10%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU
30.8 fps -22%Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 9Intel Core Ultra 9 288V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
30.1 (24.4min - 39.5max) fps -24%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
16.6 (12.9min - 23.2max) fps -58%Total War Pharaoh - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 MaxApple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU
97 fps +92%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU
58 fps +15%Average of class Multimedia (23.4 - 121, n=17, last 2 years)
55.5 fps +10%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 11-Core, Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU
53 fps +5%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU
50.6 fps Total War: Three Kingdoms - 1920x1080 Ultra (incl textures)
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 MaxApple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU
80 fps +45%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU
55 fps Average of class Multimedia (24 - 84, n=7, last 2 years)
52.8 fps -4%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU
41 fps -25%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 11-Core, Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU
35.9 fps -35%The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
116.8 (112min - 120max) fps +120%Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403UAMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
97.1 (88min, 91P1 - 103max) fps +83%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 MaxApple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU
92 fps +74%Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
81.4 (77min, 77.99P1 - 92max) fps +54%HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
80.2 (76min - 83max) fps +51%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
74.7 (70min, 71P1 - 79max) fps +41%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU
53 fps Dell XPS 14 2024 OLEDIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
52.4 (50min, 50.99P1 - 55max) fps -1%Average of class Multimedia (11 - 121, n=42, last 2 years)
49.2 fps -7%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU
43 fps -19%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 11-Core, Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU
39 fps -26%Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 9Intel Core Ultra 9 288V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
29 fps -45%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
22 fps -58%Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 MaxApple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU
118 fps +37%Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
109 fps +27%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU
86 fps Average of class Multimedia (23 - 129, n=12, last 2 years)
78.1 fps -9%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU
57 fps -34%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 11-Core, Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU
53 fps -38%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
23 fps -73%Baldur's Gate 3 | Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty | Total War Pharaoh | Total War: Three Kingdoms | The Witcher 3 | Shadow of the Tomb Raider
lowmed.highultraQHDThe Witcher 3 (2015)
85
53
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)
157
108
100
86
57
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019)
186
108.4
76
55
35.6
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)
89
77
63
61
42
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023)
50.1
48
44.6
39.6
24.9
Total War Pharaoh (2023)
64.4
55.2
51.2
50.6
49.5
排放量噪音排放与往常一样，在大多数日常工作中，两个风扇要么完全关闭，要么以每分钟约 2,500 转的低速运转，几乎听不到 25 分贝（A）的噪音。当用力推动部件时，风扇会提高转速，并很快达到最大值 44.5 dB(A)。这种声音清晰可闻，尤其是在安静的游戏过程中，可能会有点恼人。不过，总的来说，我们没有发现干扰频率或其他电子噪音。在 "高性能"模式下，风扇的噪音非常大（56 dB(A)）；相反，在 "低电量"模式下几乎听不到风扇的声音。
Noise Level
Idle
23.9 / 23.9 / 23.9 dB(A)Load
30.2 / 44.5 dB(A)
30 dBsilent40 dB(A)audible50 dB(A)loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.9 dB(A)
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 ProM4 Pro 20-Core GPU, M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple SSD AP2048ZApple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 ProM3 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, Apple SSD AP0512ZApple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 MaxM3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple SSD AP2048ZLenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13705H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLRDell XPS 14 2024 OLEDNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLRRazer Blade 14 RZ09-0508NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 8945HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLRAsus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403UNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 8945HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02Noise0%0%-15%-9%-7%-10%-15%off / environment *23.924.1 -1%24.8 -4%24.8 -4%24.3 -2%24.3 -2%23.9 -0%23.9 -0%Idle Minimum *23.924.1 -1%24.8 -4%24.8 -4%24.3 -2%25 -5%23.9 -0%23.9 -0%Idle Average *23.924.1 -1%24.8 -4%24.8 -4%26.5 -11%25 -5%23.9 -0%24.4 -2%Idle Maximum *23.924.1 -1%24.8 -4%24.8 -4%28.5 -19%25 -5%23.9 -0%26.9 -13%Load Average *30.225.1 17%25.8 15%47.4 -57%37 -23%33 -9%46.2 -53%48.5 -61%Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *44.5Load Maximum *44.549.4 -11%43.4 2%52.9 -19%43.3 3%51.9 -17%46.2 -4%51.8 -16%Witcher 3 ultra *25.143.452.939.149.546.251.8* ... smaller is better
温度在空闲模式和执行简单任务时，金属机箱保持超低温，但在高负载或游戏时，我们测得的温度比前代机型更高。在键盘中上部区域，我们测得的温度高达 47 °C，直接接触时会让人感到恼火。键帽的温度稍低，但在打字时确实能明显感觉到高温。在这种情况下，更快的风扇会让设备受益匪浅。不过，在底部，最高温度 44 °C，没有任何问题。
Max. LoadIdleCyberpunk
42.5 °C47.3 °C41 °C 41.3 °C46.1 °C40.2 °C 32.1 °C28.8 °C32 °C
Maximum: 47.3 °CAverage: 39 °C
43.2 °C44.2 °C43.5 °C41 °C43.3 °C40.7 °C32.6 °C34.8 °C33.6 °C
Maximum: 44.2 °CAverage: 39.7 °C Power Supply (max.) 49.8 °C | Room Temperature 20.3 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900Max. LoadIdleCyberpunk
22 °C22.1 °C22 °C 22 °C22.1 °C21.4 °C 21.7 °C21.8 °C21.8 °C
Maximum: 22.1 °CAverage: 21.9 °C
21.8 °C22.1 °C22 °C22.1 °C22.1 °C21.8 °C21.9 °C22 °C21.9 °C
Maximum: 22.1 °CAverage: 22 °C Power Supply (max.) 22.7 °C | Room Temperature 19.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900Max. LoadIdleCyberpunk
41.2 °C47.5 °C41.3 °C 38.3 °C45.9 °C41.4 °C 33.1 °C29.6 °C31.6 °C
Maximum: 47.5 °CAverage: 38.9 °C
43.1 °C44.5 °C43.7 °C40.3 °C43.7 °C41 °C32.7 °C35.1 °C33.6 °C
Maximum: 44.5 °CAverage: 39.7 °C Power Supply (max.) 48.2 °C | Room Temperature 20.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.3 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.9 °C / 71 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 38.9 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the class Multimedia.(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.1 °C / 91.6 F) and are therefore not hot. (-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (-4.4 °C / -7.9 F).
表面温度应力测试（顶部）
表面温度应力测试（底部）
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 ProApple M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPUApple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 MaxApple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPULenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPUDell XPS 14 2024 OLEDIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPURazer Blade 14 RZ09-0508AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPUAsus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403UAMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPUMicrosoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPUHeat-2%-18%-8%-27%-14%-6%Maximum Upper Side *47.345.9 3%41 13%40.5 14%41.8 12%46.6 1%40.4 15%Maximum Bottom *44.242.1 5%56.7 -28%42.6 4%42.2 5%47.8 -8%42.2 5%Idle Upper Side *22.123.4 -6%27.4 -24%26.9 -22%34.8 -57%26.7 -21%26.6 -20%Idle Bottom *22.123.8 -8%29.1 -32%27.8 -26%37.4 -69%27.8 -26%27 -22%* ... smaller is better
压力测试在压力测试过程中，M4 Pro SoC 的耗电量曾一度高达 68 瓦，随后稳定在 40 瓦左右。CPU/GPU 之间的分配相当均匀。总体而言，M4 Pro 的表现与旧款 M3 Pro 相似，后者的最高功耗为 55 瓦。但对于较大的 MacBook Pro 16 而言，这一数值可以永久保持。
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test CPU Power: Ø22.1 (19.969-40.363) Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test CPU Power: Ø27 (22.643-28.222) Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test GPU Power: Ø19.8 (18.582-27.706) Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test GPU Power: Ø28.4 (26.919-29.557)
发言人其中一位发言者目前的 MacBook Pro 14 配备了由 6 个扬声器组成的出色音响系统，这一点没有改变。虽然竞争对手可能已经迎头赶上，但我们没有理由抱怨它的性能。内置麦克风还能实现非常清晰的语音录制。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(+) | good bass - only 4.6% away from median(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (5.9% difference to median)Compared to same class» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%Compared to all devices tested» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(+) | good bass - only 4.9% away from median(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 1.2% away from median(+) | mids are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (5.6% difference to median)Compared to same class» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%Compared to all devices tested» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 audio analysis(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.8 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.9% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (7.3% difference to median)Compared to same class» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 95% worse» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%Compared to all devices tested» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(+) | good bass - only 3.5% away from median(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 1.4% away from median(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (5.8% difference to median)Compared to same class» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%Compared to all devices tested» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电源管理 - 电池寿命不变耗电量Apple 在最大 SDR 亮度约为 600 cd/m² 时，我们测得的峰值功耗为 11 瓦。不过，当显示 HDR 内容或在亮度传感器激活的明亮环境中时，这一数值会明显升高。在负载情况下，新款 MBP 14 的耗电量为 75-90 瓦。在压力测试中，它曾短暂达到 98 瓦，但随后又迅速下降。因此，所提供的 96 瓦电源装置在体积上是足够的，但它的剩余电量不多，无法在满负荷情况下为电池快速充电。
Power Consumption
Off / Standby 0.16 / 0.34 WattIdle 2.17 / 10.9 / 11 Watt
Load
74.3 / 98.1 Watt
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 ProM4 Pro (14 cores), M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP2048Z, MiniLED, 3024x1964, 14.2"Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 11-Core, M3 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP0512Z, Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.2"Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 MaxApple M3 Max 16-Core, M3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP2048Z, Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.2"Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, Mini-LED, 3072x1920, 14.5"Dell XPS 14 2024 OLEDUltra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, OLED, 3200x2000, 14.5"Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 14"Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403UR9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02, IPS, 2400x1600, 14.4"Average Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU Average of class Multimedia Power Consumption3%-15%-124%-54%-264%-49%-0%-27%-40%Idle Minimum *2.172.3 -6%2.6 -20%10.9 -402%8.1 -273%20.9 -863%6.9 -218%3 -38%3.39 ?(2.17 - 4.6, n=2) -56%6.05 ?(2.1 - 31.3, n=67, last 2 years) -179%Idle Average *10.913.1 -20%11.8 -8%17.7 -62%9.9 9%25.6 -135%8.6 21%7.1 35%13.9 ?(10.9 - 16.8, n=2) -28%10.8 ?(4.6 - 38.3, n=67, last 2 years) 1%Idle Maximum *1113.3 -21%12.2 -11%19.3 -75%10.4 5%32.1 -192%9 18%7.6 31%14.1 ?(11 - 17.1, n=2) -28%12.7 ?(6 - 41.6, n=67, last 2 years) -15%Load Average *74.347.4 36%99.9 -34%93.3 -26%75.6 -2%72.7 2%75.2 -1%73.1 2%75.4 ?(74.3 - 76.4, n=2) -1%67.8 ?(15.1 - 137, n=64, last 2 years) 9%Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *80.5Load Maximum *98.173.6 25%101.7 -4%150.2 -53%107.1 -9%228.4 -133%161.6 -65%128.5 -31%118.1 ?(98.1 - 138.1, n=2) -20%111.7 ?(40 - 270, n=67, last 2 years) -14%Witcher 3 ultra *42.892.5129.565.6182.1109.7113.9* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø93.3 (87.3-98.1) Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø4.28 (4.12-4.8)
Power consumption with external monitor
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø16 (14.2-23.3) Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø80.1 (75.5-84.4) Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø2.62 (2.56-2.8) Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø80.5 (78.5-83)
运行时间电池信息它的电池容量仍然是 72.6 Wh，在我们的 WLAN 测试中，该笔记本电脑的运行时间也与上一代产品相当，但根据芯片的不同会略有差异。在亮度为 150 cd/m²（比最大 SDR 亮度低 8 级）的情况下，我们测得的运行时间略低于 16 小时，远远领先于对比组中的 Windows 竞争产品。在 SDR 全亮度条件下，WLAN 测试仍能运行约 6.5 小时。我们将在接下来的几天里进一步补充电池运行时间。
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
15h 47min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
6h 35min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
19h 46min
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 ProM4 Pro (14 cores), M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, 72.6 WhApple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 MaxApple M3 Max 16-Core, M3 Max 40-Core GPU, 72.6 WhApple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 11-Core, M3 Pro 14-Core GPU, 72.6 WhLenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 75 WhDell XPS 14 2024 OLEDUltra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 69.5 WhRazer Blade 14 RZ09-0508R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 68 WhAsus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403UR9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 73 WhMicrosoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 58 WhAverage of class Multimedia Battery RuntimeWiFi v1.3947911 -4%979 3%477 -50%465 -51%428 -55%555 -41%498 -47%694 ?(262 - 1204, n=67, last 2 years) -27%
Notebookcheck 总评分Apple 新推出的 M4 Pro 处理器将 MacBook Pro 14 的性能提升到了一个新的水平，进一步扩大了对英特尔、AMD 和高通公司的领先优势。它的运行时间仍然很出色，新的磨砂面板选项非常令人兴奋，尤其是当你经常在户外或非常明亮的环境中使用设备时。其他升级还包括 Thunderbolt 5 和功能更强大的 1200 万像素摄像头。不过，你将不得不放弃 Wi-Fi 7。总而言之，新款 MacBook Pro 14 M4 Pro 是一款非常出色、功能强大的笔记本电脑，但与往常一样，这也是有代价的。
Back to the verdict
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro
- 11/14/2024 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Chassis89 / 98 → 91%
Keyboard92%
Pointing Device100%
Connectivity78 / 80 → 97%
Weight68 / 20-74 → 89%
Battery90 / 95 → 95%
Display95%
Games Performance78 / 88 → 88%
Application Performance93 / 92 → 100%
Temperature82%
Noise84 / 95 → 88%
Audio96%
Camera38 / 75 → 51%
Average75%
92%
Multimedia - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions66.8%Materials50%Packaging100%Power Use90.7%Repairability0%Software Updates50% Total Sustainability Score: 59.6%
More articles related to this deviceApple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro (MacBook Pro 14 2024 Series)Review•Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro 入门笔记本电脑评测 - 谁需要 M4 Pro？ |Review•Apple MacBook Pro 14 M4 评测--具有重要改进的 M4 基本机型 |News•iFixit 拆解配备Apple M4 Pro 的 MacBook Pro，揭示与 M3 Pro 机型的不同之处 |Review•Apple M4 Pro 分析 - 速度极快，但效率较低
TransparencyThe selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Editor of the original article: Daisy Dickson - Translator - 460 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 597207 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008contact me via:
Please share our article, every link counts!